In the opening scene of Bridesmaids, Kristin Wiig is getting pounded by a Beauty and the Beast, Gaston caricature of a man. He’s bad at sex for being brutish and outrageously unskilled, and she’s bad at sex for not telling him that he’s sexually incompetent. Either way, the scene is funny and reminds some of us of the sex we had before we were queer, or before were able to physically actualize our queerness with another person. Why is it okay for heterosexual cis people to be bad in bed, but the same doesn’t apply to queers? If a straight guy lasts for twelve seconds, it’s cute. It’s cute to joke about, at least. If a straight girl lays stiff as a board or mimics a woman in a bad porn, it’s like, “What else is new?” This is also fun to joke about.
Perhaps this is because some would argue that the sole criterion for being queer is the type of sex you do or don’t have; others believe that queerness is equal parts sexual practice and politics.
The thing is, most of the time, I’m not that into sex. It’s exhausting, it’s claustrophobic, and it’s less fun than eating. It’s so taxing, I don’t understand how anyone with a job has the energy for it. Not that I have a job, but I imagine that if I had one it would it would render me lifeless by the end of the day. It would be one thing if sex was just something you could just do for five to ten minutes as a fellow queer gyrated on top of you like a bona fide hysteric. But no. We’re encouraged to be present, creative, and actually engage. Sex must be long, complicated, and involve either a paring knive or incest “play” to be deemed legitimately queer. Guess what? No.
The thing is, most of the time, I’m not that into sex. It’s exhausting, it’s claustrophobic, and it’s less fun than eating.
For years, I’ve been told that I’m sexually “repressed,” “withholding,” and “lazy.” Once, a bold young genderqueer who I refused to piss on even went so far as to accuse me of being “sex-negative.” That all may be true, but maybe that’s all part of my radical queer femme identity.
Okay, so it’s not. I’m in no way radical. I only say I’m queer to steer clear of sex acts with cisgender men whilst simultaneously accommodating my devout lesbianism and propensity towards dating trans men when the butch pool feels too shallow. I’m femme exclusively in relation to the length of my hair and staunch refusal to reciprocate many sex acts. In other words, I’m not actually a radical queer femme, nor do I even know what it means to be one. But who are you, fellow queer, to challenge anyone’s indulgent and nonsensical interpretation of an established identity?
One time, a few years back, an ex of mine handed me a glow in the dark strap on and requested that I fuck her with it. There was never a moment in my entire life when I’ve been less turned on, but I was living with her rent-free and she plowed me with low-calorie snacks and soft drinks at all hours of the day and night, so I felt I owed it to her. I wrestled into her beet-colored harness and started awkwardly pumping away. She seemed to like it, or at least pretended she did so that I’d start doing it more often. It was then that I realized that she was one of those lesbians who got approximately zero play in her young gayhood, and then realized that if she cut off all her hair, stopped wearing underwire bras and pretended to be more masculine than she actually was that she’d get laid on a regular basis. I fell for it. And I realized this, mid-pump.
The few people I dated screamed at me whenever I tried to stop having sex after ten minutes. Generally speaking, it’s around the ten-minute mark that I start to feel like I’m owed some frozen yogurt, BBQ Soy Crisps, or at least an intense shoulder massage that incorporates a nice, scent-free oil. We would engage in heated debates that seemed to last forever about the merits of long sex versus short sex. My argument: short sex takes less time. Their argument: sex is a good thing, why would you want it to take less time? They totally didn’t get it.
Granted, there have been exceptions to my perhaps incendiary anti-sex practice and philosophy, but the exceptions are few and far between. Obviously, it’s more than mere laziness that impedes my ability to have sex with the same enthusiasm, inventiveness and frequency as most queers– insecurities about my body and fear of intimacy and rejection also come into play. If I’m committed to not caring, then it won’t faze me if someone opts to stop wanting to fuck me.
Currently, though, I’m trying to reconsider things. I’m trying to remind myself that sex doesn’t have to be contrived or laborious. But re-assessing it all is something I’m doing so hesitantly, grudgingly, and with walls up so thick that even if they could talk, it would take a powerful hearing aid to decipher their mostly-unintelligible dialect. That was a reference to 2000′s made-for-TV movie If These Walls Could Talk 2, because it is a film about lesbians. And that’s all I have to say about all that.
























































{ 22 comments… read them below or add one }
The final paragraph of this piece really makes it. I wasn’t 100% sure which direction to read all the (sarcastic? straightforward? both?) statements throughout, until I got to this reflection upon defensiveness at the end. Then I realized that the form of the piece reflected the content. Very interesting!
I feel like I don’t get this (beyond it clearly being non-literal). You obviously do get it. Break it down for those of us who don’t?
I read this piece as basically two things: [1] a criticism of a queer sexual culture in which the elaborate technology/theory/creativity/etc. of sex is more highly valued than genuine interpersonal relationships [2] Katie’s (or, if it’s not Katie, the speaker’s) reflection on the defensiveness she’s built up, partially (entirely?) as a result of this culture, and how difficult it is to start to tear down that defensiveness now that she’s entered into a relationship that has the potential to be more sincere.
I saw the tone of the piece up until the final paragraph as very walled/defensive as I was reading it, so when I got to the final paragraph, which was all about the difficulty of tearing down walls (and ends with a refusal to go into more details about something intimate), I concluded that the form of the essay was mirroring the content.
Chloe sevigny made a really hot butch.
haha! sex doesn’t need to be long to be good, some of the best orgasms i’ve had came quickly
Miss Liederman is a genius.
The problem with homosexual sex is not that it is dangerous, but that it is contrived.
Mr Black, the non-contrived (non queer) sex is productive. It leads to not-sex, which should be a relief to those so engaged. But because they are not queerly inclined, hets take baby-making and its dampening of sex as the tragedy it is not. Rather, sex for the sake of sex is the rubber-cocked night without end of the queer.
Ms Liederman’s wise observations on what a drag queer sex is lead to an unspoken cure: romanticism. The true perversity of romantic desire is more queer than the hardworking political sex Ms. Liederman rightly derides. Sex is better felt over your entire body, but for those small areas, the genitals. — Glas
Glas,
What makes you assume Taylor has written a confessional and is in need of advice, encouragement, or whatever mashup of those well-oiled genres of faint condescension you’ve got pumping here? What are you, Taylor’s own personal Dr. Feelgood, or something? Please work on your Reading Skills (not your ostensibly superior osculation).
I’m not about to tell you to like sex. Still your objections sound to me like they’re about rubbish quality, rather than just plain being asexual by nature. (Stop me if I’m wrong.) So, thoughts. Firstly, sex only exists while all participants are enthusiastically consenting. That means the thing with the glowy strap on? Not sex. Some other icky thing, verging on the R-word. Second, no wonder you’re exhausted if you’re trying to have sex for all the time you’re having sex. Confusing? Well to me way of thinking, “sex” doesn’t start at the obvious fucking and doesn’t end there either. An hour of fucking is just a gruelling exercise-marathon and not good for anything but a world-record attempt. An hour of flirts, touches, closeness and intermittent orgasms, however, is quite nice.
Julian Morrison,
What makes you assume Ms Liederman has written a confessional and is in need of advice, encouragement, or whatever mashup of those well-oiled genres of faint condescension you’ve got pumping here? What are you, her own personal Dr. Feelgood, or something? Please work on your Reading Skills (not your ostensibly superior osculation). This is an intellectual article about the problem of sex, right now, for queers who cannot return to the dream of reciprocity, romance, or even pleasure for its own sake. Good writing deserves serious, thoughtful response, not self-serving observation. Dr. Glas
ps — “intermittent orgasms” = exactly the problem!
I can now die of joy.
While he is always right on in his responses to the wider world around him, Dr. Glas really takes the cake with this latest prescription. He is accurate, he is right, he is the good doctor and the last of his breed. Glad homosexuals still know how to read and write, even against the horrible arrow of queer time that always seems to direct itself toward banal nothingness.
Not all writing has to be writing on the wall, and Dr. Glas and Miss Liederman have both displayed for us a method of writing as provocation. Thank the Lurd!
not sure how “intellectual” it is. and the recurrent “food is better than sex” cliche does not help things. but i like the general points made.
What sex acts do you staunchly refuse to reciprocate! At Hussy HQ, we’re interested in the tawdry details.
Miss Hussy: you are nothing but a cheap, tawdry slut. Glad I can still count on somethings never changing…
I staunchly believe that everyone deserves to get as laid as they want to. There is a ten minute queer of your dreams waiting out there with a bag of soy crisps who won’t make you stop watching the Real Houswives while they do it to you.
“I only say I’m queer to steer clear of sex acts with cisgender men whilst simultaneously accommodating my devout lesbianism and propensity towards dating trans men when the butch pool feels too shallow.”
This is a fucked-up joke, right? ’cause trans men =/= butch women
i don’t see her making that comparisson…
she steers clear of cisgender men.
she usually dates butch women.
when there are no butch women around, she opts for trans men.
in any case, it sounds like they’re in for an amazing night!
Yeah, and when there aren’t any cisgender gay men around, I opt for a trans woman!
How fucked up is that statement?
Not all trans men are “butch” or even masculine. Not all trans men have vaginas. To treat trans men as part of a continuum with, or an option related to, butch women is confused and inappropriate. Trans men are men. If the author wants to be a lesbian who only dates women, she should stick with dating women, whether cis or trans. Trans men are neither of those things.
i think you are just a person who has a hard time imagining people’s sexual choices not always being about “continuum”. but in my experience, the leap from lesbian to trans men is not always such a big one, since many trans men remain a part of lesbian communities, keep coming to the same bars, etc… at least in early stages of transitioning. as for the statement being “fucked up” or generalizing, like i said above to someone else who described this article as “intellectual”, i did not find it intellectual writing. and, in the end, it seems her real desire is food. i mean, i wouldn’t let myself get too offended…
No, actually I found it quite funny. Possibly because I never got the same equation as you from it.
Likewise I find it funny that in reading the whole post (or maybe, most likely, you didn’t) that is all that you got from it…
Firstly I love + adore you, now and forever. Second, I just found this post and I totally feel this way about sex all the time too! I mean it’s complicated because I’m a sexual person and have a lot of fun with the flirtation/seduction/tension building parts of sex, but I’m so neutral on the rest it’s insane, and I really just want to get it done and move on. I get so bored.
{ 1 trackback }